Perfection!
http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/reiss_pieces/Meanwhile, I'm trying to figure out why the sports gods hate me.
http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/reiss_pieces/Boy, 9, banned from school Christmas party - 'because he didn't believe in Jesus'
Teachers banned a nine-year-old boy from his class Christmas party because his parents had barred him from RE [religious education] lessons.
Douglas Stewart was forced to stay at home while his friends received presents from Santa and tucked into ice cream and jelly.
His parents were told he was not welcome at the celebration because they had pulled him out of religious eduction classes earlier in the year.
Headmaster Ian Davidson said that because the youngster had no interest in religion he could not celebrate the birth of Christ.
Furious mother Dawn Riddell, 38, said yesterday: "I've helped out at the Christmas party before and it's got absolutely nothing to do with Jesus. Douglas was heartbroken he couldn't go. It was cruel."
The boy and his brother Callum, 11, attend Cluny Primary, a council-run school in Buckie, Banffshire.
As the family have no religious beliefs, Miss Riddell had asked for them to be exempt from RE lessons.
But she was stunned when the head called with the news about the party.
She contacted Moray Council to find out its policy on school parties and was told these were non-religious.
After the council spoke to the school, the decision to exclude Douglas was put down to a "misunderstanding".
Callum was allowed to attend his party a few days later and Douglas received a present Santa had left behind.
Christmas means Christs birthday, so parties for that are to celebrate the birth of Christ
- Helen Collins, london uk
So he doesnt believe in Jesus but he believes in Santa? Ah ha, that makes sense.
- Elizabeth Akrigg, West Yorkshire, UK.
Christmas is a religious festival and not a reason to party and get presents. It is to celebrate the birth of Jesus. If you are an atheist then why celebrate what is a christian festivity!
- Rachel, Northampton
So what has Santa and childrens Xmas parties got to do with being Christian anyway? More pc nonsense. Sack the teachers. [Again, that utterly confusing use of the term 'PC'.]
- Ian, Benfleet, UK
PC or not, have a Merry Christmas
In the US these days, you can get in trouble for saying "Merry Christmas". Politically correct do-gooders argue that it marginalises people of other faiths, to whom December 25 is just the day after December 24.
Complaints from these allegedly marginalised people are conspicuous by their scarcity and we rather fancy that their faith is robust enough to withstand the implied challenge. In any event, opinion polls suggest that the pendulum is swinging back: two out of three Americans prefer the old-fashioned greeting. And at least some of the rest must think that "Bah, humbug!" captures the flavour of the season.
Having taken all this into account, we have decided to wish you a "Merry Christmas" anyway, but we stress that we mean it in an inclusive, non-marginalising way. If you want to translate it into terms more meaningful to you, go ahead.
Whatever the next few days means to you, it's important to recognise that the family over the fence may read it differently. And, whether you regard it as a religious or secular festival, it's a good time of year to think about others.
Christmas means family get-togethers, which many of us regard with a mixture of delight and horror. So do your bit: smile graciously as you open relatives' tasteless gifts or do the dishes as they snore on the couch. Spare a thought, and a dollar or two, for the less fortunate and the social and voluntary agencies who are looking after their needs. And remember when you're on the road, at the beach and in the bush: you're sharing it with everyone else and there's enough to go around. Take care of each other out there.
The earthquake, which was more powerful than the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake, was centred 50 kilometres south of Gisborne at a depth of 40 kilometres. But the Edgecumbe quake was much shallower than tonight's quake.
Inspector James Taare said police have received reports of major damage after the earthquake but do not know if anyone was injured.
He said no tsunami warnings had been issued.
Stuff.co.nz readers report the earthquake was felt strongly in in Wellington, Bleheim and Nelson and tremors were reported further down the South Island including Christchurch, Dunedin and Hokitika on the west coast.
Dennis Munro of Kohitane Farm near Wairoa reported extensive damage to his farmhouse, including a toppled chimney, cracks in the walls and a collapsed kitchen ceiling.
No one in the house was injured, but all were shocked, Mr Munro said. His family were not staying at the house tonight because of the extent of the damage.
The house was a "real mess" and even christmas gifts were destroyed, he said.
Gisborne resident Jennifer Caughy said the earthquake had caused a gas leak in Gladstone Road and a strong smell of gas.
She said worried residents were leaving their homes and heading for higher ground in case of a tsunami.
National MP Craig Foss, who lives at Waimarama on the Hawke's Bay coast said his "whole house seemed to rock for ages.
"Our youngest, five years old, was woken by the quake and noise and we all stood under an internal door frame. I am sure the lights dimmed just before the quake hit. It seemed to go on for a long time.
"There was a lot of creaking and groaning. Our home seemed to take a long time to settle down and stop moving."
A Napier reader reported their phones went down temporarily and glasses fell out of their cabinets.
Callan Attwell of the Capital and Coast District Health Board said in an email: "Everyone in theatre in the Wellington hospital felt it."
Telephones in the Gisborne area are currently down.
Alarms were set off in Lower Hutt by the quake, Hutt resident Amanda Botha said.
The earthquake was also strongly felt in the Eastern Bay of Plenty.
Trying to organise a function, Hayley from Ray White Real Estate in Auckland was politely querying the quote, and other details of her order, when she got this terse reply from Margaret:
“You placed an order last Thursday and have NEVER confirmed your order for Monday AFTER 3 emails. You asked for a quote which you were given then queried the prices against the website. Why ask in the first place. May I suggest you read the Home page of our site regarding pricing.
“I personally don’t have the time or inclination to sit on the computer all day playing email ping pong. Please confirm your order by 9am this morning some 7 hrs before the function begins TELEPHONE XXXXXXX otherwise I will take it that the order is no longer required the QUOTE IS $9.00 PER PERSON. (at this late stage chicken drumsticks will not be an option Thai chicken cakes or mini chicken satays will be) AND MAY I SUGGEST YOU COLLECT YOUR OWN STRAWBERRIES. We are a very busy catering company who has given you very good service in the past and will not be treated in this off hand manner business is business. This job if goes a head will be cash on delivery or payed by credit card. Incidentally we are going to be selling our house very soon and question your companies professional practises if this incident is anything to go by. Regards Margaret.”
Hayley replied:
“That is the rudest email I have received in a long time.
We will not be requiring your services again.”
To which Margaret responded:
“Get into the real world young lady if you ever attain the position to be self employed you may understand hard working successful business people don’t make it hiding behind late floods of emails. Not having the fortitude to call by telephone tells me your incrusted in your sit down loads of spare time job.
“Re rudest email tells me you once again you are not in the real world and haven’t fully matured but it will happen. You were probably bottle feed till late teens.
“I just have so much fun with time wasters. Have a great party shame you will have to pay so much more for it. I will hopefully be calling your boss before Christmas re our not listing our property with Ray Whites I am sure they will be interested and could give you more to do. And you thought my first email was rude. I expect you still believe in Santa Clause.”
Surfin' the 'net I saw this ad:
I clicked away from the page it was on then did the on-line version of a double-take. I ended up having to refresh the page several times to get it to appear again as the ads cycled through. The whole time I was thinking, "Did it really say 'Shop Victoriously'?"
Why not just have a picture of Russell Crowe, sword aloft and shouting "It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail."
Ruminate on that while you enjoy your Christmas turkey.
Today, median home prices [in the US] are 3.5 times the size of median annual family incomes. This may be down from the recent peak of 4.2 times incomes reached last year, but it's way above the 2.8 times that home prices averaged during 1984-2000, when lots of homes were bought, sold and built.
And if you think 2.8 is low, check out the early 1970s. That was when home prices were only 2.3 times median family incomes, and housing was selling like gangbusters.
One major homebuilder recently proved that people will buy if the price is right. The firm slashed prices by 20-30% one recent weekend - and wound up selling more than nine times as many homes as it did on previous weekends.
To get prices back to 2.8 times family incomes would require a drop of 20% from today's levels - and this does not take into account interest rates and lending standards.
To equal the affordability of the early 1970s, prices would have to fall a whopping 38%.
Hi there,
Im really sorry but we have closed our waiting list for the preschool as we have absolutely no room until at least mid 2009.
Good luck.
Compared with what you probably paid for your current home, you’ll find your currency converted to New Zealand dollars will go a very long way in our real estate market. Owning our own home is something that two-thirds of us have chosen to do and is still affordable for most. While suburban houses still account for 85 percent of house sales, inner-city and semi-rural living are becoming increasingly popular options.
Time to tighten belts - 09 Dec 2007 - NZ Herald: New Zealand Business and Personal Finance News
Borrowers will be in for some more belt-tightening next year following the Reserve Bank's move last week to stay the course with its high interest rate policy.
Economists say an official rate cut is still some way off - the consensus being sometime late next year - but that could quickly change if the US economy starts to tank.
As it stands, borrowers could be in for increases of 0.7 to 1.5 percentage points next year.
The Reserve Bank's decision to keep its official cash rate at 8.25 per cent is in contrast with recent decisions made by many of its northern hemisphere counterparts.
BS New Zealand economist Robin Clements says other central banks are clearly becoming more concerned about higher financial costs, financial instability and risk aversion from the credit market turmoil spilling over into pessimism, lower growth and lower lending.
Clements says the Reserve Bank feels it needs to batten down the hatches, not only because of the higher food and fuel prices, but also because of the expected stimulatory effects of higher dairy returns and the prospect of tax cuts arising from next year's election.
"It does seem to be an interesting contrast, especially because these other central banks have been making their decisions in recent weeks, so they are facing the same information set, and yet the Reserve Bank seems to be that much more circumspect about it all," he says.
ASB bank chief economist Nick Tuffley says the differing positions of central banks is a reflection of their economies being at different stages. "Also the crisis is affecting countries in different ways so, arguably, out of all of those, we would be the least affected so far."